Power & interconnection
Utility commitments, queue position, capacity, tariffs, and energization milestones. Proposed institutional weight: 45%.
VERDICT RATING / INSTITUTIONAL ROADMAP
Can the asset
deliver the investment case?
The proposed infrastructure rating connects power, water, land use, and permitting evidence to project economics and delivery risk.
INSTITUTIONAL OFFERING
The mandate and its evidence.
Institutional service roadmap
The capabilities below describe the planned institutional offering. The live product is a data-center diligence demonstration with manual source review, provisional screening rules, and IC working drafts. Engagement availability and scope must be confirmed with the founding team.
A permitted site is not the same as deliverable capacity.
Verdict Rating is designed to examine the conditions that determine whether infrastructure can be developed and operated as underwritten. The plan covers development and operating assets with approved evidence standards and professional sign-off.
The live data-center demo offers a provisional screening workflow. It does not issue a signed institutional rating.
PROPOSED RATING PILLARS
Deliverability has
physical dependencies.
Water & thermal
Water availability, cooling requirements, and thermal constraints. Proposed institutional weight: 25%.
Community & land use
Land use, permits, hearings, ordinances, and community context. Proposed institutional weight: 30%.
FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES
A constraint must connect
to the economics.
Capacity, timing, and commitments affect yield, debt-service capacity, and the downside.
The planned asset engine links physical evidence to IRR and DSCR, so an interconnection delay or conditional allocation can be assessed within the financial case.
Scenario analysis, automated source extraction, and institutional consequence mapping require further implementation.
RATING AND SCREENING
Two methods.
A reconciliation to complete.
Data-center screening
Six categories. Readiness and source-coverage confidence. V1–V4 screening outcomes. Manual source review and an IC working draft.
Inspect the current rules →Infrastructure rating
Three physical pillars and proposed confidence grades A–D. Original rating bands: V1 Prime 85–100; V2 Strong 70–84; V3 Conditional 55–69; V4 Watch below 55 or gate review. Calibration, hard gates, and governance remain to be approved.
The models are distinct. A methodology lead must reconcile and validate them before institutional use.
PROPOSED OUTPUT
The rating.
The conditions.
The domain view.
- An infrastructure rating with supporting evidence and approved reliance terms.
- A condition matrix identifying unresolved deliverability requirements.
- An IC view connecting physical constraints to the economics.
- A monitoring scope for changes after commitment.
EXPLORE THE SUITE
The next stage
draws on the same evidence.
Screening scopes diligence. Diligence supports the committee. Monitoring follows the investment.
All nine Verdict products →THE NEXT DECISION
Put the evidence on the table.
Explore the live data-center demonstration or speak with the co-founders about financial diligence, infrastructure, credit, and portfolio intelligence.